Back in 2005 making an observation on Europe Tom Friedman said it best that “Europe today resembles an Assisted Living Facility with Turkish nurses”.
Kanchan Gupta writing earlier today in his blog extensively chronicled the growing disquiet in Europe over the shifting demographics with a spike in Muslim minority populations.
Paranoia over Eurabia saw a direct democratic vote in Switzerland ban Minarets drawing asinine reactions in India with more fear pan-Islamic fear mongering.
While all of this is a sideshow the reality is Europe is in denial of Eurabia while the rest of the world is in denial over the cancer of Islamic radicalization.
There exist three possible responses to this cancer of Islamic radicalization.
The first response manifested itself in Switzerland with the attempt at errecting legislative walls. This at best is a short term fix for it does little to deal with the socio-economic reality of shifting demographics.
The second response manifests itself in rhetoric that dreams of a clash of civilizations of sorts. Those who suffer delusions of such a decisive clash have neither a sense of reality nor a sense of responsibility towards themselves.
So between denial and delusions there really exists no meaningful response to arrest the cancer of radicalization.
Hence exploring a third response becomes imperative. Nitin Pai over at The Acorn had argued some time back in favor of exporting an Indianised version of Islam as a response to arresting the cancer of Islamic radicalization.
One may disagree with the finer details and much of the proposal merits legitimate challenges and debate but on the face of it Nitin’s proposal merits attention.
To appreciate the nuance in this proposal it is important to suspend legitimate skepticism that is rooted in popular association of Indian Islam with bodies like the Deoband and political entities who have traditionally tapped into Muslim insecurity.
If we were to look beyond the self appointed guardians of the Muslim Community we would find pockets of communities in India who continue to retain their native memory of Dharma and Indian Culture. These communities have managed to find a harmony between their current practise of Islam and their native memory of local Culture rooted in Dharma.
This harmony is not just unique to pockets of Muslim Communities in India but extends to all those South East Asian nations that have their cultural roots in Dharma and subsequently embraced a version of Islam exported from India. Indonesia with its cultural memory of Sanskrit, Ramayana stands out amongst these nations.
This is not to say these communities have escaped the cancer of radicalization. The AfPak mess, fundamentalists in Bangladesh and Al-Qaeda affiliated terrorists in Indonesia continue to remind us that the cancer of radicalization is real and far from benign.
But then in these Islands of “resistance to complete submission” to the literal text of Islam lies the only hope of arresting and perhaps reversing the cancer of radicalization. For these “Islands of resistance” by retaining their memory of native culture and an innate sense of Dharma have found alternatives to the literal text in their practice of Islam.
In these native alternatives to the literal text of Islam lies the anti-dote to the pan-Islamism that is at the heart of radicalization. The same pan-Islamism that sees Islamists from Somalia to Chechencya making a common cause.
This precisely is the reason why NDTV’s Vishnu Som makes a very dangerous argument when he describes the Swiss Minaret ban as a psychological threat to Indian Muslims. For by doing so he perpetuates the same radical pan-Islamism that is the anti-thesis of the local alternatives which from their memory of native culture have found harmony and tolerance.
In this battle against radical pan-Islamism we have a choice to make.
We can errect legislative walls to further fortify the ghetto within which the cancer of radicalization will continue to breed.
OR
We can delude ourselves into believing that a defining Culture Clash will magically eradicate all traces of this cancer
OR
We can repudiate every attempt at pan-Islamism by exporting that which makes these Islands resist the literal text of Islam – a memory of native culture rooted in Dharma that is not influenced by edicts and diktatrs issued in Arabia and elsewhere.
To all my friends who are predictably agitated by this line of argument let me urge that they reflect on what the RSS Chief Mohan Bhagwat means when he tries to remind Indian Muslims of their ancient cultural heritage with references to Qawwalis and Mazaars. He essentially is referring to this same memory of a native culture that makes their practise of Islam in India harmonious and tolerant.
Filed under: DesiPundit, India Lok Sabha Elections 2009, Shveta Chhatra, War on Terror
Latest Comments