Offstumped – Center Right Indian Politics

Icon

based on Dharma, Liberalism and Nationalism

Mamata in Singur – Will this drive a wedge between UPA and CPI-M

Trinamool Congress chief Mamata Banerjee Tuesday continued her hunger strike for the second day Tuesday against farmland allocation for an industrial project.  Social activist Medha Patkar continued her hunger strike on Tuesday. Social activist Medha Patkar continued her hunger strike on Tuesday. West Bengal Chief Minister Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee on Tuesday appealed to Trinamool Congress Chief Mamata Banerjee and social activist Medha Patkar to end their fast. After BJP President Rajnath Singh, it was the turn of NDA Convenor, George Fernandes to join ally Trinamool Congress Chief Mamata Banerjee.

Conventional wisdom would be to dismiss away the events in Singur as a Mamata inspired ruckus to boost her lumpen style politics. The vandalism by legislators of her party inside the West Bengal assembly goes further to confirm conventional thinking. But then there used to be the adage: what Bengal thinks today, the rest of India thinks tomorrow. The unexpected plunge into political turmoil in West Bengal over the return of manufacturing, via the Tata’s small car factory project at Singur has raised speculation on what it means to the CPI-M UPA relationship and if this was the thin end of the wedge ?

The politics over Singur defies conventional wisdom in every sense of the word. What you have in Singur is a democratic Government run by an unapologetically communist party working overtime to defend a highly controversial political decision to allocate what was once agricultural land to a business house that has been the symbol of capitalism and free enterprise. You have the Communists comrade in arms in every other sense the pro-naxal organizations protesting the Communist decision. You have known corporate and government baiter Medha Patkar protesting the communist decision. Keeping all of them company the mercurial Mamata Bannerjee. And adding fuel to all this fire is the BJP joining the protests with rather unusual eagerness.

So what explains the BJP move to plunge headlong into the protests with Mamta to the point where its President Rajnath Singh made a sudden decision to go to Singur only to get arrested midway. Rajnath skipped a meeting with President APJ Abdul Kalam on Uttar Pradesh affairs to be in Kolkata to express solidarity with her on the Singur issue. Ironically, Mamata had ditched the BJP only last month to join hands with the Congress for the recent by-polls in the state. The Trinamool and Congress came together after several years on the Singur issue. The success of the 12-hour strike called by the Trinamool Congress on October 9 was credited to the Congress’ support.

Any conventional read of the turn of events in West Bengal would be a mistake given the unconventional politics at play in West Bengal. Many reasons have been attributed to the BJP’s eager beaver support to Mamata ranging from preventing her cosying up to the Congress to Rajnath’s eagerness for taking up farmer’s causes. On the face of it Rajnath’s public pronouncements seemed to highlight the farmer angle.

But let us take a hard look at the reality. The reality is West Bengal is not due for polls in another 5 years. The Left has an overwhelming majority in the Bengal Assembly. Mamata while a useful ally does not make or break the NDA’s chances in the next elections, especially given the drubbing she has suffered in the assembly polls and how low her stock is with the conduct of her party in recent times. So the overtly agrarian courtship playing out in Bengal has a deeper objective. To understand that let us look at the math in the Lok Sabha. The stability of the Manmohan Singh dispensation despite just a 10 seat edge over the BJP stems from the 60 odd Leftist members of parliament from West Bengal and Kerala. The current Lok Sabha is unique in that none of the smaller outfits in the UPA has the ability to bring down the government on its own. In fact the only outfit with the numbers and potential motivation to bring down the government are the communists. But then the sum of all secular fears represented by the BJP has kept them united thus far. The only scenario where the Left could withdraw support to the Manmohan Singh Sonia Gandhi UPA would be over a issue with the potential to drive a wedge between these so called secular allies. There in lies the BJP’s calculation. What better a wedge issue to test the secular unity than to corner and embarass the Communists defending a Capitalist cause in their backyard with tacit congress support. Sensing the wedge potential of these protests the central government expressed its support to chief minister Buddhadeb Bhattacharjee’s drive for industrialisation putting the West Bengal congress in a spot.

Offstumped Wager: Most of the mainstream media is viewing the Singur issue with conventional lenses making it about unreasonable street politics versus development oriented governance. While this makes sense the underlying politics defies conventional political wisdom. The tipping point could be a very violent turn of events triggering a heavy response from the state government which could throw up imponderables for the Congress and the CPI-M at the Centre. The key question here is how far is Mamata prepared to go before either she or the CPI-M blinks. The mercurial leader is waging the political bet of her life and she may very well be prepared to take this to the brink. That brink could very well be at the thin edge of the Congress CPI-M relationship. 

Filed under: Uncategorized

13 Responses

  1. Sugata Basu says:

    What you all see happening in Singur may be new to some of our generation, but this is not new to the people of West Bengal. These kind of dirty politics made West Bengal to loose her position in Industrialization and this kind of negative politics sends negative signal to the Industrialists. It was the late 60s till mid 70s some scrupulous people who used to call themselves Naxalists and obey the Chinese chairman as their chairmen(Altough I don’t know whether the chinese chairman Mr. Mao Tse Tung was aware of that or not, if heared about that then he would have laughed on them ), they started destructive politics by Gheraos, Bandh, beating up Industrialists, causing damages to the industries,government properties and even attacking the education system (only what I can say about it is that, to write “N-A-X-A-L” also you need to have knowledge of alphabets). Thus forcing West Bengal to walk back an further back. Also left are there to be blamed because they also walked the path of Strike,Bandh,Gherao when the Industrialisation was in critical state and also the Central Govt. itself was playing regional politics. This regional politics is Congress’s game for long, starting from the day of Independence till now they are playing the game with the Eastern States specially with West Bengal. If not, then why we had to wait for 11 years to complete Brakweshwar Thermal Power and 9 years for Haldia Petrochem?

    It’s only after 1993, when Govt. of West Bengal came up with their new Industrial Policy, we the people of West Bengal saw a hint of light. And the left Ministers Mr.Jyoti Basu, Mr. Budhdhadeb Bhattacharya, Mr. Nirupam Sen has put forth their entire effort to bring back the images, and suddenly TMC,Naxals and SUCI(rightly said, Socialist Unity Centre of Jaynagar) has started destructive politics. They have lost almost all the elections in every stage, people is not behind them but still they are continuing violence since they don’t have any support by the people of West Bengal with them.these way they are trying to create violence and make people panicky but it’s true that TATA motors plant is bound to happen and it’s our suggestion to Ms. Patekar to kindly go back to your state and fight for the farmers who are committing suicides in great numbers everyday. then we will come to know how much you really feel for the farmars. And Mr. Rajnath Singh,please go and see the way your BJP ruled Rajasthan Govt. is dealing with the farmars who were on roads on demand of water.Police killed 14 farmars there. Don’t hamper the growth of West Bengal and try to snatch the investments from West Bengals fate to some where other places since you people(BJP) even don’t run even a municipality in West Bengal. People of West Bengal is against your communal politics and that’s why they have kicked you out of West Bengal for long.

    Sugata Basu

  2. [...] (Yes, the same goes for Mamata Banerjee and Rajnath Singh on India’s side of the border) Permalink | « The coup is inFiji | Home |  [...]

  3. Corporate Serf says:

    The state congress in West Bengal does not matter. SG has decided to sacrifice congress chances in the state to cement communist support in the center. Its no loss to her personally, this is not her constituency; in addition it marks one less place from where local congress leaders can spring up to challenge her supremacy.

    Of course, to dislodge the communists from power, congress participation is essential. The closest Mamata came was in 1999. If she had been inside congress at that time she would have succeeded. This is the essential arithmetic in the state.

  4. [...] In the fracas over land for a new factory in a Communist party-ruled state, convenient political labels prove inappropriate. [...]

  5. kausik hazra says:

    I am happy that your website discussing such a burning issue of our state. All are thinking of only Industry but no one can not imagine or feel the socio-economic transformation of the farmers or residence of such lands. One building a house for Rs 7,50,000.00 but got only Rs. 1,50,000.00 as a compensation who will paid the balance money or how they find a new land and build a house.

  6. Hari says:

    I think the family of Adhip Lahiri (the murdered engineer in Bangalore) deserves an explanation from the likes of Mamata Banerjee. The only way Bengalees can work close to their family is if industries develop in West Bengal..

    Similarly 7 million unemployed need explanation from the naxals and crazy Mamata..

  7. [...] Offstumped had however broken ranks with many of the fellow bloggers and right of center commentators in the media to call into question the justification for such such state sponsored acquisition of private property irrespective of the purported justification passed off as “industrialization”. Offstumped had then speculated if the role reversal of sorts being played out in Bengal would drive a wedge between the UPA and the Left. Subsequently Offstumped had  argued that the State should play no role in land acquisition and it should be left to the local communities and individuals to directly negotiate with Enterprises, in the context of Land Acquisition for SEZs.  [...]

  8. [...] 5th December 2006 – Mamata in Singur – Will this drive a wedge between UPA and CPI-M [...]

  9. [...] 5th December 2006 – Mamata in Singur – Will this drive a wedge between UPA and CPI-M [...]

  10. [...] 5th December 2006 – Mamata in Singur – Will this drive a wedge between UPA and CPI-M [...]

  11. [...] 5th December 2006 – Mamata in Singur – Will this drive a wedge between UPA and CPI-M [...]

  12. Abhijit Banerjee says:

    In singure issue Mamata is not correct position. Her dessision will destroy the dreams of thousands of beagali engineer.

  13. alam says:

    In singur issue Buddhadeb is in correct position.
    all of thinking for industry but not mamata.
    young generation want any type of industry.
    young generation is the future of india.

Leave a Reply

Real Time Commentary via Twitter

Categories

Offstumped Archives 2004-2009